This is my 100th post, and after a little over 5 years of this ministry has taught me one thing, that there will always be questions to answer. As long as the world remains as it is, people will possess a curiosity that drives them to seek out the truth of the world. What I have found is that certain people have issues with religion and Christianity because they have “too many unanswered questions”. What I want to show today is that questions are not a bad thing, and that you need to eventually come to faith as a means of getting certain questions answered.
What I want to do first is to show that this attitude of “too many questions” is hypocritical, especially if you are someone who trusts in the scientific process. Science is all about answering questions, but there are plenty of areas that we have little information about (Ph.D. comics has actually written a book on specific topics in this area). Bringing it closer to home, as I do research in my lab, I always have questions that I could answer, but some of the proposed experiments get left behind because my advisor and I decided that we had enough evidence to make our case for the science we were presenting in our article we were submitting for publication. We always have questions that go unanswered for some reason or another. So if you dismiss religion because of your questions, you might want to treat science in the same manner.
Another area in which having all questions answered is an unreasonable demand is in the court of law. J. Warner Wallace is a fellow Christian Apologist who has decades of experience working as a detective, and he says in one of his books that this type of question is asked of potential jurors. If a juror needs every single question answered, they will most likely not be picked for the jury, because that juror will be impossible to persuade to make a decision in light of the best evidence that either side can produce.
Even in scripture, there were questions asked of Jesus that he could not answer, because the Father had not revealed this answer to him, God the Son (Matthew 24:36). This is a huge revelation about the nature of this universe before God settles his eternal kingdom in the new heaven and earth, that God has plans that only He knows about for His creation.
On a second point, that questions keep people from faith, let me use an analogy here. As I came to know the woman that would eventually become my wife, I had questions about her and our potential future together. Sure, one could “google” my wife and find out some information about her, but eventually I had to take the steps to come to know my wife as a person and pursue a relationship with her. As we grew closer together, new situations arose and we got to explore how we would respond to those situations together as a couple.
The same goes for the Christian faith. It is a continuous process of refinement and being made anew into what God has for us. We will come to points where we don’t understand what is going on, but we have our past with God to rely on to lead us to faith (trust) in Him that He knows what He is doing. When we either go home, or when God comes to us to establish his kingdom, we will have all of our questions answered. I hope this little think piece has helped some of you understand the nature of questions and their relation to faith. God bless and have a good rest of your day.
Popular posts from this blog
What I want to do today is to write a brief summary of each of the arguments for the existence of God that I have come across in my studies; that seem to hold any water (I won’t be calling on the youtube video that argues for design just because a human hand can hold a banana). If I miss any that you believe to be a part of this review, please contact me and I will research the argument and update my post here. The Kalam Cosmological Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CulBuMCLg0 – This argument focuses on the prime mover, or the uncaused first cause. The argument goes as such: everything that begins to exist has a cause, the universe began to exist; therefore the universe has a cause. Dr. William Lane Craig is the biggest proponent of this argument, and further develops the characteristics of this prime mover and shows that the God of Christianity is the best fit for this uncaused first cause. The Contingency Argument https://w…
I saw a video during my Sunday service about the floods of people that are coming to church for Easter or Christmas, maybe they only come once a year, or are interested in what all the hubbub is about. For those interested, it follows that they might have questions. Now, I have written plenty about scholarly questions to Christian faith, but does this mean that everyone should have these answers? Not necessarily, because many times the questions are not scholarly, but emotional. We should be able to answer these as well. These types of questions will be case by case, so a systematic rulebook of answers cannot be written here. However, the Bible does give us some guidelines in how to talk to one another. We are called in Colossians to let our speech be seasoned with salt and grace (Colossians 4:6). In 1 Peter 3:15, we are commanded to deliver our answers with gentleness and respect. These are general sweeping statements on how we are to conduct our speech, so let’s apply them to our …
Quite a few people have been convinced by the mass media that more science and education are the answer to everything, but is it really? Science is quite good at what it does, but it does have limitations and areas that its hands cannot reach. Now as I have stated before, I am a scientist, or at least a graduate student of chemistry, whichever title you would like to apply. I have no delusions about the limitations of science and where it cannot possibly reach. There are those who will have their own definitions of science, and honestly it is rather overused in the United States at least. Science is a field where hypotheses can be repeatedly tested to be proven or disproven. There are plenty of fields where science cannot carry out this rigorous testing and retesting, so I would not classify these fields as sciences. Take history for example, unless we figure out how to go back in time and verify events for ourselves, we are left with only the account…