What I want to do today is to write a brief summary of each of the arguments for the existence of God that I have come across in my studies; that seem to hold any water (I won’t be calling on the youtube video that argues for design just because a human hand can hold a banana). If I miss any that you believe to be a part of this review, please contact me and I will research the argument and update my post here.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CulBuMCLg0 – This argument focuses on the prime mover, or the uncaused first cause. The argument goes as such: everything that begins to exist has a cause, the universe began to exist; therefore the universe has a cause. Dr. William Lane Craig is the biggest proponent of this argument, and further develops the characteristics of this prime mover and shows that the God of Christianity is the best fit for this uncaused first cause.
The Contingency Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPCzEP0oD7I – This is a bit of a spin on the Cosomological argument, and goes as such. Everything that exists has an explanation of its existence. If the universe has an explanation of its existence, that explanation is God. The universe exists, therefore the explanation of the universe’s existence is God.
The Ontological Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBmAKCvWl74 – This argument talks about the possibility of a maximally great being. If it is possible that this maximally great being, otherwise known as God, exists, then God does exist.
The Argument from Fine Tuning/Teleological Argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Yt7hvgFuNg – This argument discusses the universe as a set of constants (universal constants such as the weak and strong atomic forces, the cosmological constant, and so on), if any of these constants were off by a little bit, then life would not be permissible
The moral argument https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxiAikEk2vU – This argument bring up something that could be a little controversial in today’s postmodern society. This argument posits this. If objective moral values and duties exist, then God exists. Objective moral values and duties do exist, therefore God exists.
These arguments should be a good starting point for a beginner in apologetics, who wants to examine some basic arguments for the existence of God. Since this should be out by around the new year, this could be a new beginning of faith or a new journey for a believer who wants to know why they believe what they believe. May God bless you, and I wish you all a happy new year!
Popular posts from this blog
I saw a video during my Sunday service about the floods of people that are coming to church for Easter or Christmas, maybe they only come once a year, or are interested in what all the hubbub is about. For those interested, it follows that they might have questions. Now, I have written plenty about scholarly questions to Christian faith, but does this mean that everyone should have these answers? Not necessarily, because many times the questions are not scholarly, but emotional. We should be able to answer these as well. These types of questions will be case by case, so a systematic rulebook of answers cannot be written here. However, the Bible does give us some guidelines in how to talk to one another. We are called in Colossians to let our speech be seasoned with salt and grace (Colossians 4:6). In 1 Peter 3:15, we are commanded to deliver our answers with gentleness and respect. These are general sweeping statements on how we are to conduct our speech, so let’s apply them to our …
I have been feeling recently that I needed to get back to basics for apologetics, as my original intent of this blog was to communicate what I have learned as I studied apologetics. I don’t discount my more recent work, but I may have been getting into a rut of writing opinion pieces about current events and politics. I may still contribute a post or two in 2019, but my main goal for the next few months is to write a series that looks at the topics that I think should be “basic training” for up and coming apologists. The first question that I want to look at are objections to the resurrection of Jesus, since that is the cornerstone of our faith (1 Corinthians 15:14). What I mean by objections to the resurrection, are people who look at the scriptures and think that there are glaring wholes in the gospels that exclude the idea of the resurrection. This will be close to something that you may have seen from the likes of J. Warner Wallace or Lee Strobel. To get started, there are those fa…
I’m sure the current political climate in the United States needs no introduction, so I can dive straight in to this post. Should Christians get involved in politics, and should we be taking sides with each political controversy? This falls into a previous post of mine, describing the role of emotions in truth arguments. What I would like to do is have a short post describing my thoughts on the current political process, and why Christians should be interested in truth over politics. I think as Christians, truth and justice should matter over politics. I will admit that neither left, right, or moderate has a monopoly on these. I think that we should be looking at each political issue on a case by case basis, and deciding what is best there, regardless of what side of the aisle it falls on. I think what matters is whether or not our answer aligns with scripture. For instance, environmentalist political policies are mostly considered left-wing by conservatives, but we know as Christians…